Harold v. Harold

Summary

The Supreme Court reversed and remanded because the Family Court incorrectly treated Wife as agreeing to an equal property division, attributed unsupported income to Wife, made undisputed errors in calculating expenses, apparently overlooked Husband’s pension, and failed to address Wife’s request for fees and costs. The Court upheld the treatment of Husband’s credit-card debts as marital debts and found no error in using Husband’s stipulated salary, but required reconsideration of property division, alimony, and fees on remand.