Galindez v. State

Summary

The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed Galindez's convictions for robbery, assault, weapons, and criminal mischief. It held that the Superior Court did not abuse its discretion by giving the standard eyewitness-identification instruction rather than Galindez's more detailed proposed instruction, and that any improper prosecutorial vouching was harmless because the court gave a curative instruction and the identification evidence was strong. No separate opinions were filed.