Eggleston v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed Eggleston’s convictions and sentence, concluding that the State did not breach the plea agreement because the agreement expressly provided for open sentencing. It also rejected the related ineffective-assistance claim and held that the Superior Court did not abuse its discretion in denying sentence reduction based on Eggleston’s claim concerning access to a C-PAP machine. The Court determined that the appeal was wholly without merit under the applicable withdrawal procedure.