Caulk v. State

Summary

The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed Caulk's convictions and sentences after independently reviewing the record under the withdrawal procedure. It held that his double-jeopardy, evidentiary-sufficiency, perjury, Miranda, and evidentiary-admission arguments lacked merit or were unpreserved and failed plain-error review. The Court also declined to consider ineffective-assistance claims on direct appeal, leaving them for postconviction proceedings.