Anderson v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed Anderson’s convictions for possession of a firearm by a person prohibited and carrying a concealed deadly weapon. It held that Anderson’s unpreserved challenges to three jurors did not constitute plain error because the trial judge questioned each juror about impartiality and was best positioned to evaluate their responses and demeanor. The Court also approved appellate counsel’s withdrawal under Rule 26(c), finding the appeal wholly without merit.