Aaron Thompson, Defendant Below, Appellant v. State of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

Summary

The court affirmed Thompson's convictions and sentences, holding that neither challenged rebuttal statement constituted prosecutorial misconduct. It also held that the entirety of Bey's recorded police statement was admissible under the rule of completeness because Thompson had introduced portions of it during cross-examination and the full statement fairly placed those portions in context. The court therefore did not reach the alternative grounds for admissibility under the prior-consistent-statement rule or the statutory witness-statement provision.