Oscar Martinez, Petitioner Below, Appellant v. Dana Metzger, Respondent Below, Appellee.

Summary

The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the denial of Martinez's repeated efforts to obtain sentence relief under the habitual-criminal statute, Criminal Rule 35, certification procedures, and habeas corpus. The court held that his Rule 35(b) motion was barred as repetitive, his ten-year sentence was not illegal under Rule 35(a), he did not satisfy the requirements for certification, and his facially regular commitment did not support habeas relief.