Moore v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed Moore's convictions for aggravated possession of cocaine, aggravated possession of heroin, and second-degree conspiracy. Applying de novo review, it held that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the State, permitted a rational jury to infer that Moore acted with Cherry to facilitate drug sales, based on surveillance evidence, Moore's apparent lookout activity, the drugs found in Cherry's vehicle, and Moore's fingerprints on the heroin bag.