Hubbard v. State

Summary

The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed the denial of Hubbard’s post-conviction motion. It held that his ineffective-assistance claims were not procedurally barred, but that he failed to establish prejudice or objectively unreasonable representation concerning the accomplice instruction, prison phone recordings, or eyewitness identifications. The court also upheld denial of an evidentiary hearing and rejected the cumulative-error claim.