Bradley v. State

Summary

The court declined to consider Bradley's unpreserved claim that a canine sniff of his vehicle violated the Delaware Constitution because the alleged error did not satisfy plain-error review, and it concluded that the warrant was supported by probable cause. The court also held that sufficient evidence supported Bradley's aggravated-possession conviction based on evidence connecting him to the vehicle and cocaine. It remanded for resentencing because the aggravated-possession and drug-dealing convictions must merge, while affirming the convictions otherwise.