Miller v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed Miller’s convictions and twenty-year sentence. It held that the search affidavit established probable cause even after allegedly false informant information was excised, that Miller was not entitled to an in camera informant hearing, and that circumstantial evidence sufficiently established possession of more than five grams of heroin without expert chemical testing. The sentence was within statutory limits and was not shown to be illegal or based on unreliable or impermissible information.