Webb v. State

Summary

The Supreme Court affirmed the denial of Webb's motion for reargument because it was filed beyond the applicable five-day deadline. The court also held that it lacked jurisdiction to review the underlying postconviction claims because the untimely reargument motion did not toll the appeal period, and noted that Webb lacked standing under Rule 61 because he had completed the challenged sentence. The court further warned that it would not continue expending judicial resources on meritless claims.