Thomas v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Thomas’s convictions for aggravated menacing, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, and driving under the influence. It held that the evidence was sufficient to establish aggravated menacing even though the victim and Thomas did not have a face-to-face confrontation, and that the prosecutor’s closing argument was proper. The court found no plain error and concluded that the appeal presented no arguably appealable issue.