Blenman v. State

Summary

The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed Blenman's convictions for two counts of possession of a firearm by a person prohibited after independently reviewing the record under Rule 26(c). The Court rejected his unpreserved discovery, search, speedy-trial, evidentiary-access, and exculpatory-evidence claims for lack of plain error, held that the evidence was sufficient to establish constructive possession, and declined to consider ineffective-assistance claims on direct appeal.