Andrew Lloyd, Defendant Below, Appellant v. State of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee

Summary

The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed Andrew Lloyd's convictions for racketeering and related offenses arising from a heroin-trafficking operation. It held that the racketeering instruction, read as a whole, adequately described an association-in-fact enterprise; that the evidence was sufficient under plain-error review; and that the State did not plainly err by questioning witnesses about plea agreements admitted without objection. The court also rejected Lloyd's cumulative-error claim because it found no underlying errors.