Thomas v. State

Summary

The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed Thomas's convictions and sentence after independently reviewing the record under Rule 26(c). It held that the challenged hearsay did not warrant relief, the traffic stop and protective frisk were supported by adequate grounds, any error in admitting testimony about the reported disturbance was harmless, and sufficient evidence supported the convictions. The Court also concluded that counsel had conscientiously examined the record and that the appeal presented no meritorious issue.