Stayathome v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed the Superior Court’s sentence for a probation violation because the corrected sentence was within statutory limits and did not exceed the previously imposed Level V incarceration. It also rejected the claims that the sentencing judge was biased or had a closed mind, and that the violation proceeding had to be handled by the judge who presided over earlier violations. The judicial-assignment claim was reviewed for plain error because it was not preserved and failed under that standard.