Supreme Court of Delaware

Mark G. Zambrana, Defendant Below-Appellant v. State of Delaware, Plaintiff Below-Appellee — Strine, J., Concurring

June 30, 20152015 Del. LEXIS 319

Summary

The concurrence agrees that Zambrana's conviction should be affirmed because the statutory term "depiction" can reasonably include a mental image of a minor's nudity. It reasons that this interpretation accords with the statute's broader language and legislative purpose, even though Zambrana did not create a photograph, video, or other physical image.