Huffman v. State

Summary

The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed the denial of Huffman's first postconviction motion. It held that his statute-of-limitations and ex post facto arguments lacked merit because the applicable limitations period had not expired before the statutory amendment, and it held that his remaining claims were either outside the scope of Rule 61 or procedurally barred. The Court also concluded that the charged offense date supported the sentence imposed and that the prosecution was timely because the offenses were not reported until 2010.