Holsey v. Hynes

Summary

The Court affirmed the Superior Court's orders denying Holsey's motions to set aside a sheriff's sale and for a new trial. It held that Holsey had standing and that his appeal was timely, but the alleged payment delay, loan-process irregularities, denial of pro hac vice admission, and asserted grounds for relief under Rule 60 did not warrant disturbing the sale or judgment. The Court also concluded that the Superior Court did not abuse its discretion in declining to grant another continuance.