Herring v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed Herring's habitual-offender sentence and found the appeal wholly without merit. It declined to consider his ineffective-assistance claim on direct appeal because the claim had not been adjudicated below, and it rejected his challenges to the prior convictions, the age of the convictions, the presentence process, and alleged sentencing misstatements. The Court independently reviewed the record under Rule 26(c) and found no nonfrivolous appellate issue.