Dunn v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed Dunn’s convictions for first-degree robbery and theft after independently reviewing the record under the withdrawal procedure for appointed appellate counsel. It held that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the State, was sufficient for a rational factfinder to find that Dunn used force to take the victim’s phone and caused physical injury. The Court concluded that Dunn’s asserted inconsistencies concerned witness credibility, which was for the Superior Court to resolve.