Desmond v. Biden, III

Summary

The Court affirmed the Superior Court's dismissal of Desmond's mandamus complaint because he had an adequate remedy under the postconviction rule and was attempting to relitigate a claim previously rejected. The Court also revoked his in forma pauperis status based on an untruthful certification and directed the Clerk to reject future filings unless accompanied by the required fee or an approved, properly sworn application. No separate opinions were filed.