Cruz-Urvina v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Cruz-Urvina's convictions for aggravated menacing and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. It held that eyewitness testimony, corroborated by firearm-related items found in his room, was sufficient to support the firearm conviction even though the weapon was not recovered. It also held that references to the victims' infant daughter were factual and did not constitute prosecutorial misconduct.