Britt v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed Britt’s convictions, holding that sufficient evidence supported his first-degree reckless-endangering conviction as to Toston. Britt knowingly fired a gun through the doorway while aware that Toston was somewhere inside, creating a substantial risk of death through direct impact, fragmentation, or ricochet. The Court also held that the trial court’s acquittal concerning Custis was not inconsistent because Britt was unaware Custis was present. No separate opinions were filed.