Brathwaite v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed the denial of Brathwaite’s third postconviction motion, motions for appointment of counsel, and discovery. It held that his claims were barred by untimeliness, repetitiveness, procedural default, or prior adjudication, and that equitable tolling could not make the motion timely. The Court also held that Brathwaite failed to overcome the applicable procedural bars.