Krafchick v. State

Summary

The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed the denial of Krafchick’s third motion for postconviction relief. It held that his claims were procedurally barred, that he had not established an exception based on the interest of justice or a miscarriage of justice, and that his evidentiary-hearing claim was unpreserved. Because the underlying claims were barred and lacked a basis for review, the court also upheld the denial of appointed counsel.