Dunn v. State

Summary

The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed Dunn’s conviction and sentence for hindering prosecution. It held that the trial court properly admitted a witness’s prior statement because the State established its voluntariness by a preponderance of the evidence, and that the evidence supported denial of Dunn’s motion for judgment of acquittal because the hindering-prosecution statute focuses on knowledge of acts constituting a crime, not completion of the crime before the assistance occurred.