Tyrone Guy, Below-Appellant v. State of Delaware, Below-Appellee

Summary

The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed the denial of Guy’s postconviction motion on independent and alternative procedural grounds. It held that his accomplice-instruction claim was previously adjudicated and that the later rule he invoked neither applied factually nor operated retroactively; it further held that his ineffective-assistance-of-postconviction-counsel claim was not barred by the successive-motion rule but was untimely under the applicable one-year period and conclusory. No separate opinions were issued.