Parris Hamilton, Below-Appellant v. State of Delaware, Below-Appellee

Summary

The court affirmed Hamilton's convictions, holding that the trial court adequately cured an expert psychiatrist's incorrect legal testimony concerning voluntary intoxication and the extreme-emotional-distress defense. It also held that the State presented sufficient evidence that Hamilton lacked a privilege to remain in the dwelling, satisfying the unlawful-entry element of first-degree burglary.