In Re Davis

Summary

The Supreme Court of Delaware affirmed the Board on Professional Responsibility's findings that Michael R. Davis committed multiple ethical violations, including violating his suspension order, making material misrepresentations, engaging in alcohol-related misconduct, and acting dishonestly in connection with a motor-vehicle accident. Applying substantial-evidence review to factual findings and de novo review to legal conclusions, the Court found no error. The Court independently determined that disbarment was necessary to protect the public, preserve confidence in the profession, and maintain the integrity of the disciplinary process.