Glen Murray, Defendant Below, Appellant v. State of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee — Ridgely, J., Dissenting

Summary

The dissent would affirm the denial of Murray’s motion to suppress, reasoning that the evidence was discovered through the driver’s voluntary consent during a lawful traffic stop and, independently, through Murray’s spontaneous admission that the bag contained drugs. It further concludes that any allegedly unlawful treatment of Murray did not causally taint the driver’s consent or the search. Because this is a dissent, it states the author’s proposed disposition rather than a controlling holding.