Moore v. State

Summary

The court held that the Superior Court lacked jurisdiction to impose restitution after discharging Moore from probation where the discharge order indicated that no restitution remained outstanding and the plea agreement limited potential restitution recipients. The court also held that imposing the expanded restitution order and entering a related civil judgment without notice or a hearing violated due process. The judgment was reversed, and both the restitution order and civil judgment were vacated.