Pettiford v. State

Summary

The court affirmed Pettiford's convictions and sentence after independently reviewing the record under the applicable procedure for appointed counsel seeking withdrawal. It held that the evidence, including testimony from two codefendants and corroborating bank records and videotape, was sufficient for a rational jury to find Pettiford guilty, and that one codefendant's testimony was admissible because it was based on personal knowledge. The court concluded that the appeal was wholly without merit and granted the State's motion to affirm.