Farrow v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed the denial of Farrow's motion for credit time, holding that his Delaware sentence did not begin until he completed his Maryland sentence. Time spent in Delaware pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers was credited against his Maryland sentence, so Farrow was not entitled to duplicate credit against his Delaware sentence. The Court also granted the State's motion to affirm because the appeal was controlled by settled law and lacked merit.