Chisholm v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed Chisholm's conviction for possession with intent to deliver marijuana after independently reviewing the record under the withdrawal procedure. It held that Chisholm could not challenge the vehicle stop because he did not own the vehicle, that the odor of marijuana combined with his conduct established probable cause to search him, and that the evidence supported intent to deliver. The Court also rejected his claim concerning trial counsel because he did not pursue dismissal or request to proceed without counsel.