Broadnax v. State

Summary

The Court affirmed Broadnax's convictions and sentences after independently reviewing the record under the procedure governing appointed counsel's withdrawal. It declined to consider his ineffective-assistance claim on direct appeal, found no plain error affecting the voluntariness of his guilty plea, and rejected his challenges to the habitual-offender sentencing procedure. The Court concluded that the appeal presented no arguably appealable issue and granted the State's motion to affirm.