G. Solis, Respondent-Appellant v. K. Tea, Petitioner-Appellee and Cross-Appellant

Summary

The court held that an unincorporated separation agreement concerning child support may be reformed when an unforeseen, adverse change in the obligor's finances makes enforcement inconsistent with the child's best interests. It affirmed the findings that the 1971 agreement was valid, was orally modified in 1977, and did not include an agreement to provide for all of the wife and children's needs, but reversed the refusal to consider reformation and remanded. The court also affirmed the denial of reargument.