State v. Christon M.

Summary

The court affirmed the defendant’s convictions, holding that the home-invasion information gave adequate notice that liability could rest on either statutory subdivision even though it tracked the felony-based language of one subdivision. The court also rejected the unpreserved double-jeopardy claim because home invasion and firearm assault each require proof of an element the other does not, and the assault was not a predicate offense under the theory submitted to the jury.