Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Carlos G.
January 20, 2026354 Conn. 21
Summary
The court affirmed the defendant’s convictions, holding that specific unanimity instructions adequately protected his federal constitutional right to a unanimous jury verdict even though the trial court did not submit special interrogatories identifying the particular incident on which each sexual-assault conviction rested. Because the defendant failed to show that the federal Constitution requires interrogatories in addition to proper unanimity instructions, his unpreserved claim failed. No separate opinions were filed.