Supreme Court of Connecticut

Grant v. Commissioner of Correction

January 20, 2026354 Conn. 30

Summary

The court held that the petitioner was prejudiced by trial counsel's failure to investigate and present a key witness's cell phone records. The records would have objectively contradicted testimony central to the state's case, undermined a detective's corroboration, and supported the petitioner's third-party culpability theory, creating a reasonable probability of a different verdict. The court reversed and remanded with directions to grant habeas relief, vacate the convictions, and order a new trial.