Freccia v. Freccia

Summary

The court held that the notice to quit did not strictly comply with the statutory requirement because it inaccurately identified the plaintiff as acting as executor even though she individually owned the property. The defect nevertheless was circumstantial, not substantive, because the notice conveyed the essential information and did not mislead or prejudice the defendants; consequently, the trial court retained subject matter jurisdiction. The judgment affirming possession was therefore affirmed.