Wang (Health Body World Supply, Inc. v.)

Summary

The court affirmed a contribution judgment against Wang under the Connecticut Product Liability Act. It held that comparative responsibility may be allocated among all defendants in an action involving a product liability claim when the defendants contributed to the same indivisible harm, and that Wang remained bound by the 20 percent allocation despite reversal of the separate medical malpractice judgment. The court also held that the one-year limitations period begins when appellate proceedings concerning the underlying judgment terminate, making the contribution action timely.