Supreme Court of Connecticut
State v. Haynes
July 1, 2025352 Conn. 236
Summary
The court affirmed the murder conviction, holding that a voluntary statement obtained after a Miranda violation could be used to impeach the defendant's trial testimony under the Connecticut Constitution and that existing precedent should not be overruled. It also upheld admission of photographs taken pursuant to routine arrest procedures because they had an independent source, and upheld admission of a witness disclosed shortly before trial because the defendant showed no prejudice. No separate opinion is included in the record provided.