Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Nixon

December 10, 2024350 Conn. 804

Summary

The court held that a trial court may direct the commissioner of correction to apply specified presentence confinement credit on a judgment mittimus. It further held that the defendant's motion to correct an illegal sentence presented a colorable claim that his plea agreement included the promised credit, giving the trial court jurisdiction to consider the motion. The dismissal was therefore reversed and the matter remanded for consideration of the merits.