State v. Daren Y.

Summary

The court reversed the defendant’s convictions arising from conduct involving B because the charges were filed after the applicable limitations period and the defendant had not knowingly and voluntarily waived that protection. It also reversed the first-degree sexual-assault conviction involving J because the evidence did not establish the required mouth, lips, or tongue contact with J’s genitals, while rejecting the challenges to the jury instruction and admission of sexual-misconduct evidence and to the handling of psychiatric records. The case was remanded for acquittals on the reversed charges and resentencing on the remaining convictions.