State v. Daren Y.

Summary

The court reversed the defendant's convictions arising from conduct involving B because the charges were filed after the applicable statute of limitations expired and the defendant had not knowingly and voluntarily waived that protection. It also reversed the conviction arising from conduct involving J because the evidence did not establish the physical contact required for the charged offenses. The court rejected the challenges to the admission and instruction concerning sexual-misconduct evidence and to the handling of the complainants' psychiatric records, affirming the judgment in all other respects.