R. H. v. M. H. — concurring

Summary

The concurrence agrees that the trial court's order must be reversed because it permitted the custodial parent to suspend the other parent's visitation indefinitely. It disagrees with the majority's categorical view that a custodial parent can never receive limited authority to cancel a particular scheduled visit when necessary to protect a child from potential harm. Chief Justice Robinson, joined by Justice Mullins, would allow narrowly confined authority in extraordinary circumstances but concurs in the judgment because this order went too far.