O'Reggio v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities — dissenting

Summary

The dissent would reject the narrow definition of supervisor used by the majority for hostile work environment claims under Connecticut law. It would instead treat an employee as a supervisor when authorized either to make or recommend tangible employment decisions or to direct a subordinate's daily work activities, because that approach better advances the state's remedial antidiscrimination purpose. Robinson, C. J., joined by Mullins and Ecker, would reverse the judgment below.