In re Criminal Complaint & Application for Arrest Warrant — concurring

Summary

The concurrence agrees that the writ of error should be dismissed, but would do so because the plaintiffs were parties to the underlying proceeding and therefore were required to seek review by direct appeal rather than by writ of error. It reasons that the election statute granted the plaintiffs a legally protected interest in seeking arrest warrants and that denial of their applications made them aggrieved for appellate purposes. ECKER, J., concurring, would dismiss without prejudice to a possible motion for permission to file a late appeal.